Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR versus STATE

Section 2 302 / evidence34 Definition of evidence The motive for this incident was established by the statements of the prosecution witnesses. Though the articles which proved the crime, Kalashnikov and his parcel of evacuation were not sent on the same date, but were sent with a one-day gap, his explanation was recorded and taken seriously. Competition was not even done, otherwise sending parcels of criminal articles did not matter because secret agencies were fired for the same Kalashnikov reports of the presence of immunity witnesses. At the relevant time of the incident, the complainant was appointed and examined in length from the witnesses regarding the method of arrival of the assailant / accused, their manner of attack and their departure from the scene of the incident. Was checked. All such witnesses stood trial. Cross-examination and defense failed to raise any doubt in their statement that the fact that the sighting of the eyes was 112 miles from the location of the incident, does not mean that at the time of the incident, In the presence of, it was not possible that the prosecution had succeeded in convicting the culprits from the house because they were properly punished and sentenced and the case ordered. The court cannot be interfered with in this regard famous lower court advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer