Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN TOBACCO CO. LTD. versus N.-W.F.P.

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 6 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 18, 25 and 185 (3) KR6 (3), Tobacco Marketing Control Rules, 1993 Constitution of Article 18 and 25 of Touchstone R6 (3) ), Under the Tobacco Marketing Control Rules, 1993, tobacco companies were required to provide farmers with copies of cultivating vouchers to the Pakistan Tobacco Board and the relevant bank branch, and violated Art 18 and 25. He was attacked. Constitution, which guarantees the freedom of trade and the equal protection of law to citizens, respectively, Rule 6 (3), the Tobacco Marketing Control Rules 1993, under Article 25 of the Constitution or the Freedom of Trade Freedom guaranteed under Article 18 of the Constitution. Can be understood Rule 6 (3), Regulation of Tobacco Marketing Control Rules, 1993 is in accordance with the nature, the current method and method of payment of liabilities to the tobacco growers by the applicants (tobacco companies), in any way operating in a lawful manner. Will not be restricted or banned. The cigarette trade created by the tobacco companies, believes that R6 (3), the Tobacco Marketing Control Rules, 1993 placed an additional financial burden on the tobacco companies because instead of two copies of vouchers under the old practice, they are now Will need to prepare four. Copies of the same when paying farmers, R6 (3), Tobacco Marketing Control Rules, 1993 have no ground for being unconstitutional and for violating the right to freedom of trade guaranteed under Article 18 of the Constitution. Which has no basis to interfere. The High Court verdict was dropped. In these circumstances the leave to appeal to the Supreme Court will be denied family advocate from New Saeedabad lawyer