MAA DIN versus STATE
In direct conflict with the allegations contained in the FIR case, medical evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 336/337 F (v) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Were. An accused, thus, deserving of release on his bail, needed further inquiry The other suspect was hurt in the dispute and was not accused of being a habitual, hard, frustrated, or dangerous offender. If a former offender was found to be available for prosecution in the case of the trial and the prosecution if he was convicted, he would be required to pay Rs 20,215 for the same amount of teeth if he apologized. It was just a matter of time before the hearing began. And further detention of the accused could not serve any useful purpose. The application for leave for appeal was changed under the circumstances to appeal and accordingly the accused was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Thul lawyer
