Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ATEEQ versus ASGHARI BEGUM

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 12 and 56 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O xxxxx, Rr l & 2 Suite for the specific performance of the contract of sale as a tenant to the defendants against which the order of withdrawal was granted Went, filed an effective lawsuit. After the withdrawal order was approved against them, there was a sale agreement between the parties and the defendants received a large amount of money according to the terms of the sale agreement, the defendants completely denied the sale agreement. Had, even if it was an undisclosed part of the defendants, proved that they had agreed to sell the property, such an agreement would be void, failing to file a lawsuit for temporary injunction The remaining plaintiffs, their support will not be in balance and they will suffer irreparable harm or injury. Make them temporarily entitled to the injunction of the opposing plaintiff, however, as a property tenant, they will not be evicted / expelled and, as such, according to the law, Relief claimed to continue the execution, Under section 66 (a), the Special Relief Act, 1877, no injunction can be issued to stop judicial proceedings. advocate from Jalozai lawyer