SARDARA versus MUHAMMAD KHAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Trial and sale of trees growing on common ground The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's case on the basis of exclusion of other co-owners by a co-owner. That he no longer lived. The co-owner of the property in which the trees were planted and was being sold to the appellate court, however, the trial court's decision and order aside, and the decision of the plaintiff's case and the appellate court's ruling that follows the High Court The source was verified in review. On the basis of the correct appreciation of the documentary evidence contained by the plaintiff Appellate Court and the High Court, this land was properly maintained, because there was no common ground and no division between the parties, the defendants unilaterally growing trees there. Couldn't sell, or build anything on it. And the High Court's order did not demand the intervention of the Supreme Court, which remains in place.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Khandabad lawyer