IFTIKHAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 of the Marriages (Prohibition of Spam Spending) Act 1997 (Arts) 199 and 25 Constitution of the Constitution without the power of the marriage spouse, eating or other food at the wedding ceremony Restrictions on drinking service. (Prohibition of Spam Expenditure) Act, 1997 and objected to the ban on food or other food service at wedding ceremonies, without recording any specific allegations of corruption or any misconduct of government workers. That the law was against the intentions of Islam. Granted, Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 were not in violation of Article 25 of the Constitution of the Marriage (Prohibition of Expenditure) Act, 1997, which has no classification.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Kamalia lawyer
