HAMAYUN versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), 5 397 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance: (VI of 1979), Section 17, Bail, Identification of the accused at the time of identification. At the time of the identification parade, neither the prosecution's witnesses specifically stated that the accused was involved in the alleged incident, nor was it recorded that the accused was the person who mistakenly gave his name as As stated in the FIR conviction under Section 397, the PPC was seven years while the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, under the Harabah Section 17 of 1979, went on commission. No property was not taken away, punishment sentence was reduced to three years, therefore, did not affect the provision of Section 497 prohibited. As a CR PC, prosecution had confirmed that no recovery from the accused had taken place, nor did the prosecution confirm that the accused was in a court case. For more than six months, Toddy did not need the police nor was he a former criminal nor a serious criminal case, thus, 49 497, involved under the provisions of section (2) of the Cr PC and He was entitled to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Daur lawyer