Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SAEED AHMED versus THE STATE


Suppressing Terrorist Activities (Special Court) Act 1975 Section 4A Panel Code, (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Case Transfer / Complainant transferred the case from the Sessions Court to the Special Court because the accused What constitutes murder? The TT pistol charge with the brother in connection with the murder of the victim with the TT pistol, although made in FIR, challan and under Section 161, CRPC, was in the statement of the prosecution witnesses but none of the accused The TT pistol was not recovered, with material available to the trial court / session court. The use of the TT pistol in the murder has not been proven. The mere allegation in the FIR will not be sufficient to prove the use of the TT pistol when it was not recovered and the material on record has confirmed the fact. Was not supported.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Kalaswala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.