Find a Lawyer

ZIAULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 13, 32, 86, 97, 156 and 2 19 bail, the real name of the accused in the wrongful identification of the accused was Ziaullah Khan. The manager was in different corporations, while in FIR and the challan of the accused was mentioned as Zia Khan and the authorities did not bother to confirm the names of the accused even though full details were available on the official record against the accused. In these situations, error was identified. Sending an appropriate person to stand trial, nor to any person whose identity is not established, was the only charge against the accused who bought the imported glass on which no duty was paid. The glasses were freely available in the market and the prosecutor could not show that it was a limited item and was responsible for the alleged duty, as the buyer of the glasses from the open market could not be dragged into the case. Bought glass that had no duty assistance, especially when it was freely marketed in section 156 (1) of the Customs Act, 1969 The offense under KCL (14) did not fall under the Prohibited Clause of Section 497; as the CCPC, the offense was punished for three years or a fine. The first case was approved for the grant of bail, as it required further investigation in the case. The accused was entitled to be granted bail. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Shahpur Chakar lawyer