WAZIR ALI KHOJA versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 185 ()) Master and Servant Constitution Application Employee Privatization Bank Job Termination of Employment Except for the right to relief in the nature of warrant, the clause contained in the petition was not related to any employer. The warrant against the employee was neither directly challenged by the constitutional application filed by the employee before stating the facts nor mentioning the grounds for attacking in connection with the termination of his service. The court has no warrant, which is why the warrant is aided. Article 199 of the Constitution challenged the legality of an order terminating the service of employees under the powers of judicial review, however, in fact the matter was not extended until the inquiry. Employees of the Privatization / De-nationalized Institutions cannot challenge the termination of their services through the constitutional patentee. (N) In accordance with Article 199 of the Constitution, the finding of the High Court regarding dismissal of employees, termination of their services as reasonable and appropriate termination does not guarantee interference with the Constitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
