SHAHID ALI versus KARACHI UNIVERSITY
Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance 1962 Section 33 (2) Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Regulations, 1965, Regulation 4 (1), Note (ii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 4, 8 and 25 Educational Institutions. Recovery of the Constitution made by applicants under Regln 4 (1), Section 33 (2) of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Regulations, 1965, Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962, unfair, discriminatory, irrational. By challenging the wires of the Note II. Failure to exclude the authority's jurisdiction and basic rights, under which any student who was obtained or disqualified on the first occasion of the first professional MB, B section examination, is further Medical / Avoid eligibility for dental education, including any violation of fundamental rights. In the application of Regulation 4 (1) of Article II of Regulation 4 (1) of Pakistan Medical and Dental Company, unequal treatment or discrimination was found. The Informal Regulations, 1965, were initially designed to examine and protect all admissions to medical institutions that did not have end-to-end review and qualifications that enabled them to continue their studies until the end. , Not on the basis of any discrimination or discrimination. , The Code of Conduct cannot be considered criminal, nor will it violate fundamental rights or other constitutional provisions, especially the Articles 2A, 4, 8 and 25 of the Constitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Upper Dir lawyer