ALEEM JAFFAR, EX-LINE SUPERINTENDENT, WAPDA versus WAPDA
West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act 1958 Section 17 (1A) [as amended by Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (Amendment) Act (XIII of 1994)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Removal of WAPDA Employees Order or Retirement Simplicity Effect: Where the disputed order of removal or retirement was simple and was not tainted with any kind of society, the fact that the Authority had initiated disciplinary proceedings prior to the approval of such order , It will not in any way submit this order as a legally invalid order. Not simple in terms of section 17 (1A) of the Act, but because of the showcase notice and the employee's response, the question was defrauded and the employee's removal order was set aside and the employee was amended by the Act. In the terms of section 17 (1A), the reinstatement with the Back Benefit Authority, however, was obliged to notify its employees in writing on the ground on which the action was proposed within a fourteen day period. The Authority shall have the power to grant Section 17 (1A), West Pakistan Watts, in order to give him the opportunity to give a written reason against the same. Pass a fresh order against the employee as per the amended supply of the R&P Development Authority. Act, 1958
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
