MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE ALIAS LADDU versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 324, 337 F (v) and 337 L (ii) [as substituted for the Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Ordinance (XII of 1993]) in the complaint defined by the complainant, the complainant made the same statement in court. As it was listed. The FIR and this statement were supported by prosecution witnesses. The accused was given the opportunity to cross over to the complainant and the witnesses and even to present his own testimony in defense, the accused was examined, the complainant and the prosecution were witnesses, but no case could be found in the prosecution. Is. And the full evidence of the Medical Evidence Prosecution case was given. Iii The incident and the injuries to the victim's thighs and hands clearly showed that the accused had the intention and knowledge that his act could cause fatal injury to the victim. And his crime is fully established. His sentence was upheld, but the accused was already sentenced to more than three years, imprisoned, the accused has already been sentenced to tension
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Harnai lawyer