Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 302/324/34 The defendant's co-accused of the evidence, who were not charged directly with the motive, appear to have broadened the network and the nature of the person's injury to the prosecution witness. Had shown that they were the result of falling to the ground. Through considerable caution and justice management, the defendant was entitled to the benefit of the suspect, after having sustained knife wounds at the hands of the main accused in the prosecution case, the prosecution had fully confirmed. The presence of eyewitnesses to the case against the main accused cannot be doubted by the central account, motivation, medical evidence and recovery because they were residents of the same area and the person has full control over the time and place of the pelvis injury. Had explained his presence with The prosecution's witnesses left no room to deny their presence at the scene of the incident, and there was also a positive defense version of the chemical examiner's report and serologist that was presented by the accused was not understandable. It is not yet known why the accused's sister was left abusive if the accused has seen her in a questionable case in the adjournment case against the central suspect, though he has been proven. The trial did not warrant the death sentence, as according to the complainant's own statement that the suspects were suspected of illicit relations between the deceased and his sister, it is possible that it could not be ruled out that the central accused had violated the family honor. Worked and that his death sentence was death. The victim, who was not justified, was retained as the main culprit power of attorney advocate Narang Mandi lawyer