Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR versus THE STATE

Section 302/316/337/324/148/149 Testimony of the evidence On the record, the prosecution's evidence fully proved that there was a sudden dispute between the parties in which both the accused and the complaining party were injured by four co-accused. Those involved in the incident were found innocent and because they were bad, the prosecution could not prove any charges against them. The recovery of the weapons of the crime did not prove beyond any doubt, the trial court had overlooked the case of the accused who were injured in the exchange of stones despite medical evidence which showed that all the injuries. Are engaged. One suspect sustained five injuries on one of the suspects and four injuries on the other, which were similar to the injuries suffered by the complainant, which clearly showed that both Brick batting has been exchanged and stone was by. Such a weapon, which was not likely to cause death by the usual suspects in nature, was more understandable and appropriate in that the fight between the parties was, in the circumstances, 5302/34, pp. Was changed from C to Section 316, PPC and co-accused were also acquitted of the charge under Section 302/34, PPC, but were punished. Section 2424 PP, PPC was retained and accordingly both were convicted divorce advocates from Bhara Kahu lawyer