ABDUL MUJEEB versus THE STATE
The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Criminal Code (v. 1898), the weapons allegedly recovered from the possession of Section 103 accused, were not forwarded to Franzek and the Ballistic Expert for comment on the nature and merits of such weapons. To be determined. Whether it was automatic, semi-automatic or in this case, it was in the working condition, where the suspect was arrested and the business area was reported. But no attempt was made by the police to get any person involved with the public and nothing came on the record to show that the members of the public had refused to join as a conscience of the department. 103, the CRPC's mandatory provisions were violated; in those circumstances, the accused had already given the entire sentence to him by the trial court; The High Court accepted the accused's appeal, giving the benefit of the doubt and set aside the trial court's decision. Accused by the consent of the State Council
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Tando Jam lawyer