Find a Lawyer

FAREED AHMED LANGRA versus THE STATE

Definition of Section 13D Proof of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965. All the prosecution witnesses were police officers and no one was involved in the arrest and search process, nor did the police attempt to engage an independent witness despite the location of the alleged incident, which was a densely populated area. Even at the last hours of the night, shops, hawkers, where private witnesses were available to the public, the weapons allegedly recovered from the accused were not presented to the court nor kept in evidence, as during their statement. No specific question was raised on the accused, such as 34 342, whether the CR PC was charged with such a mistake. S had raised serious prejudice, the trial because the defense ballistic expert report was evidence of the alleged weapons without considering the principles of correct definition without any reasonable reasons and evidence. The raids depicting Roznamcha's entry in the proceedings went on a party patrol when the alleged weapon was recovered by the police, but the police did not offer it. The seriousness of the prosecution's story arose out of serious suspicion due to the lack of such an important document, the accused was not asked to produce the alleged weapons license in his statement under Section 342, CR. The PC and the weapons were allegedly recovered from the accused, they were not sealed. After the prosecution failed to prove a case against the accused, the trial court sentenced the accused and the sentence was set aside and the accused Was freely punished. top civil advocates from Sehwan lawyer