MUHAMMAD ASIF versus THE STATE
Section 497 Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392/411 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 Bail, Bail Bail was requested in which it was claimed that F. The IR is silent about the details of the accused's physical characteristics. Nor was there any identification parade to link the suspects to the incident, although the minutes were not provided in the FIR by the complainant, but they were practically due to night time. There was no action, especially when the accused and co-accused were traveling in a car. The accused was identified by the complainant when the police arrested him with suspicion while the suspect was found guilty on the other articles of the complainant under section 9090/1111, PPC. The co-accused was operating with the suspect while he recovered a pistol. Keeping the complainant out of his luggage, no ground was available at the pistol point due to night-passenger-robbery, so at this stage the accused could be admitted for bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Garh More lawyer
