Find a Lawyer

IQBAL versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 300/34 Testimony of Evidence Blood Recovery Factum \ TOBA \ was allegedly used by the accused when Defendant was not challenged during the Investigation Officer's investigation. Yes, but it has also been reported that blood staining has been found to be a charge of recovery. The same image should be considered as a piece of evidence for the prosecution's testimony presented by two witnesses, although the deceased had a close relative, but none of their statements were found to be unusual, contradictory or contradictory. ? A permanent statement detailing the location of the incident, the alleged three-hour delay in filing the FIR, described the testimony of a prosecutor who could not have been suspected of being present on the occasion from his presence. Submitted all the related doubts. The prosecutor's testimony from the incident was a natural witness to the crime at the scene of the incident and his testimony was dependent on the testimony of another prosecutor who was a close relative of the deceased and in another village located 12/15 miles from the scene. Although it may be said that the opportunity to be a witness is not stated, his statement cannot be taken forward only at this point, while giving the details of the incident, the witness clearly stated that the accused was / is equipped with And he had a fatal blow on the left side of the neck. When his two accomplices were apprehended, such witnesses also provided details of the presence of the late Ihata residents and the presence of their witnesses, without any further inquiry that created any particular contradiction. Was gone like this immigration advocates from Khushal Kot lawyer