Find a Lawyer

SIRAJUDDIN versus HABIB BANK LTD.

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 247 Banking Tribunals Ordinance (LVIII of 1984), Offer, Section 9 and 10 Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance (XIX of 1979), Section 4 and 6 of the Suits for Receiving Balance Keeping in view the application, presiding officer, banking tribunal maintenance, the documents kept before them by the plaintiff / applicants, the case was filed against the defendants / applicants for recovery of the dues, the plaintiffs / applicants. The Presiding Officer filed an order challenging the appeal approved by the banking tribunal, but the ground respondent Lehan / Applicants failed to submit a dues with Banking Proviso in section 9 of the Banking Tribunals Ordinance, the 1984 Banking Tribunal approved, and the plaintiffs / applicants filed their constitutional petition ordering the High Court to dismiss the appeal. I claimed. That the Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984, was not extended to Federal A for the Tribal Areas administered by the Banking Tribunal in accordance with Article 247 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) and the order issued by the High Court. The opposition to the petitioners / applicants was canceled on the basis that the Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984 was. The Federally Administered Tribal Areas were not expanded, but the plaintiffs / applicants dealing with the plaintiff / defendant bank, who worked for the disputed refund, were prosecuted in a pending court banking tribunal. And the tribunal was able to pass that order. And in favor of the plaintiff / defendant bank famous supreme court advocate from Thul lawyer