GHULAM MUSTAFA versus MUHAMMAD SHAFFI
The NWFP pre-emption Act 1987 section 24 [as amended by the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression (Amendment) Act (X of 1992]], the West Pakistan General Clause Act (XI of 1956), section 9, from time to time by the defendant through bank guarantee. It was not clear in his jurisdiction the trial court's order to terminate the trial by the Court of Appeal, in which the plaintiff was specifically instructed to pay 1 / 3rd of the sale price within 30 days and Submit to the claimant in the form of a bank guarantee. / The third part of the sale price within the time set by the court failed to offer a bank guarantee on the pretext that the court was being closed for summer holidays; it could not offer a bank guarantee if the summer vacation The excuse was not expected for the applicant if he could deposit the cash within the stipulated time, which could provide an equal bank guarantee in that period. In the case of the provision of Section 9, the West Pakistan General Clause Act, 1956, the facts did not apply as the bank guarantee was presented to the court several days after the opening of the court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Khanbel lawyer