Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KASUR

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 3 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The sale of the land in question by the applicant to the person whose allotment was forged and forged, the Assistant Commissioner inquired as to whether the underground land. Was never allotted. However, verifying the Assistant Commissioner's finding, the Vendor Assistant Commissioner recommended that the District Collector of the applicant be allotted, while no allotment was made in favor of the seller, ordering the revenue record to be valid, the land revenue record. I've been deemed necessary. The provincial government's case was shown as a question and it was allotted by the respondent's claimant. The constitutional petition against such allotment was rejected by the High Court, as well as its intra-court appeal. Was not Supreme Court Int: Did Not Come to the Courts There was no case of merits on the Appellant's status as Applicant and in his constitutional application the Assistant was rightly dismissed The Commissioner, although it was recommended that the land hearing be sold to the Applicant, but as such There was no restriction in the law. The applicant also acknowledged that he did not have possession of the land under section 3 (1), Evacuee Property and the relevant period made under it. The Homelessness Act (Cancellation) Act of 1975, therefore, was not entitled to purchase the same applicant, thus, he could not make any valid complaint against the district collector's order or allotment in favor of the respondent. That had units. The leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances family advocate from Piaro goth lawyer