MUHAMMAD WARYAM versus MAHMOOD ALIAS MOODA
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Guarantee, the grant of a plea of constipation was equivalent to the trial of the accused who has already entered bail. In the FIR, the accused was named in the role and both the accused and his co-accused were found innocent by the investigating officer and both were kept in column no.2 and no overt act was attributed to the accused and At no point was he accused of causing any injury. The trial court did not give the witness of the affected or injured prosecution any reasonable reason in rejecting the accused's bail plea when, on the basis of which, his co-accused was found entitled to bail. In the case of co-accused bail, the trial court did not adhere to the correct law of law because it failed to maintain equitable treatment of persons and conditions in the same situation and the accused was involved in the principle of consistency. The accused was also granted bail in connection with bail on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Gilgit lawyer