MEHBOOB ALI versus FAZAL YOUSAF SADIQ
Sindh Buildings Control Ordinance 1979 Sections 14 and 16 of the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 1979, Regulations 155 and 158 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AX Xenimax, RR 1 and 2 Defendants respond to the demolition of shops under their tenancy. Orders against temporarily demand immunity. During the state of the suit intelligence nature, the power of the building and the building in which the shops in question were located, the fact that the court was not the appropriate authority to determine such matters, could only be ascertained. Whether the building can be repaired or not. Partially or completely demolished after serving properly with demolition notice was suitable for restoration or renovation, the proper way for them was to use the Building Control Authority. Appear to the appropriate committee and give them a convincing view so that it can be built into reality. The question was not in a dilapidated and dangerous condition as the defendants have alleged the supply of Section 16, Sindh Bui Long Control Ordinance, 1979, granting the right to appeal the order passed by the authority within thirty days. He did not, however, take advantage of this right and brought a suit for relief; all other members of the building in question left Plaintiff Nazir near the plaintiff. After the Commissioner was appointed to inspect the building and prepare a report on its nature, condition and strength, it was also reported that the matter was in a dilapidated condition, with the plaintiff temporarily making a strong case for injunction I failed, no irreparable damage, however, was removed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Bolan lawyer