Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJID KHOKHAR versus FAZAL ELAHI SIDDIQUI, ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT

Section (4 ()) concerned advocate and record-breaking allegation of wrongdoing was engaged in a pending appeal before the Supreme Court and after paying him full compensation, he appeared in the Supreme Court to argue the complainant's case. I failed. As a result, he had to return a large amount of money that was given to him through a Labor Court review application against the appeal, due to time constraints and the absence of a complaint from the advocates. The dates of the hearing were also not informed on occasion. The parties did not present any evidence other than the affidavit, version of which, contradicting each other, the facts which were established, were that the complainant had to defend both the lawyers in the appeal to the Supreme Court. Was engaged and was not informed of the hearing date. The Advocate did not appear in the Supreme Court while the Advocate appeared on record and the appeal against the complainant was accepted and compensation was not allowed to the complainant. The review request filed by the complainant was withheld over time and due to the failure of the Advocate on Record to appear, and the Advocate Advocate and the Advocate on record were contradicting not only all the important aspects, but also the common law cases on each other. In addition to the allegations he made, he did not appear before the Supreme Court, the Advocate's conduct before the Bar Council Tribunal explicitly defrauded and severely disregarded the principles of professional conduct of an advocate, Returning the fee received by the complainant without any justification list of advocates from Mandra lawyer