Find a Lawyer

M.R. HASSAN versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD

The applicants were legally told in the form of a charge sheet that the specific allegations of irregularities against the applicants were given in the Cooperative Society Act 1925 Section 22A & 50A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). There was a fair response from them. On the basis of documentary evidence which did not require the recording of any other evidence as it was never denied, the High Court, after considering the material on record on the extension, concluded that it was retained by the authority. The allegations laid were acknowledged, but the petitioners sought to justify the financial damages in which they failed before two competent jurisdictions that the High Court ruled that there was no deficiency. After considering the requests of the parties, consider the defective order on the proper definition of the material on record Appearances were denied, no legal jurisdiction or irregularities in the rules or invalidity were noted in the orders considered good for the forum below. Appeal leave was denied in the circumstances. list of supreme court advocates from Sherani lawyer