Find a Lawyer

GUL SHER versus STATE

The testimony of section 302/34 was not according to the prosecution's testimony whether the defendants had a pistol or two pistols that were alleged to have come to the defendant, had not been established and it was not known that the motorcycle. In use or not The prosecution's witnesses were not credible because they gave contradictory and contradictory statements. Medical opinion did not support the version. The source of the light at the time of the crime was not established by the prosecution. The judge was silent in the matter whether such a person could be identified, the prosecution did not bring on record that the date of the lunar month had been made on the night of the incident, after which the identity of the accused could not be accepted. Identity was impossible at the time of the incident My report will not be of any importance to the Ballistic Expert because the accused Did not fire the fatal shot accordingly, the prosecution's witnesses confronted the prosecutor's confession statement and the two statements could not be reconciled because they did not completely agree with each other. In the absence of strong affirmative evidence, such a confession cannot be ruled out. The trial was not of any importance; the trial court failed to prove the accused beyond reasonable doubt, conviction and punishment given to the accused by the court. best law firms from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer