Find a Lawyer

FAZALUR REHMAN versus MUHAMMAD SADIQUAN

Indemnity of the temporary rent order passed by the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 16 and 21 Rent Controller Order, the justification of the section 16 (2) law, as a provision of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979, as a preventive provision. Fines should not be passed. Until then and under the section, the requirements for passing such an order were met on the basis of the material on record, where the rental order was temporarily approved for a month's rental deposit. Was gone and the parties then compromised, under which the rent was raised to Rs 1,200 and its effect from the date of 3500 monthly and thereafter, the landlord refused to receive the rent. And refused to issue invoices, rent tender through money order, original temporary rent order was no longer due to rent rate because the landlord The mine was, thus, barred from filing an application under section 16 (2), to temporarily enforce the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979, not to be rented due to an increase in rent by the parties to the order, Money. Sending the rent through the orders was not a violation of the temporary rental order approved by the trial court, thus, passing the order under section 16 was a mistake by law. () The ordinance was set aside for the imposed order and the matter was remanded to the rent controller so that he could decide on the merit as well. ask a advocate free from Pindi Bhattian lawyer