MUHAMMAD IRFAN KHAN versus JAVED AHMED CHATTARI
Representation of the People's Act 1976, sections 52, 55 and 63, alleging corruption and restraining the election petition against maintaining the election petition, meant that the applicant had to specify the extent of the illegal and corrupt process. I was unsuccessful and this request is not applicable for non-joiners. The burden of pleading for the applicant to specifically mention cases of illegal or corruption was not such a drastic step in the initial stages, however, to expel a returning candidate, the allegation of corruption practice was a criminal charge. And in case of doubt. The Election Tribunal did not disclose the applicant's adherence to the provisions of section 55, the Representation of People Act, 1976, and the election petition, suggesting that the determination of the election petition must take advantage of the evidence. For the attachment was invalid all the parties rejected their retention objections, so the election requests were to remain in place.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Tando Allahyar lawyer