MURAD BAKHSH versus JEHANGIR
Limitation Act 1908 Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 185 (3) Impact of non-issue of limitation = Although the respondents raised objections to the limitation, no case was presented in this case nor. Defendants have ever claimed such a case before the trial court even though it has been pending for more than three years, the defendants, too, have aggravated such complaints by the defendants in the High Court. Or not suppressed, even before the Supreme Court of the parties disputes their rights after finding out the truth. , Such a complaint cannot be accepted at the discharge stage. Following the proper definition / evaluation of the record / court evidence / material brought by the courts, the courts recorded below, while confirming the harmony of the courts below, it was concluded that unless the courts Detection is not misleading, materially defective, or outright illegal, cannot be interfered with. The High Court's decision to exercise the jurisdiction of the amendment proceeded in the correct premises and, in fact, was denied by the Supreme Court in the absence of a grant of leave to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Shorkot lawyer