Find a Lawyer

TAJ DIN versus KARIM BUKHSHRT

Section 2 (v) of the Muslim Marriages Act 1939, Proviso (C) decides to terminate the marriage due to the husband's instability to dissolve the marriage, on the only evidence presented by the family doctor to the lady doctor. The wife approves of her husband's incompetence. Even though his wife was forbidden, she was a virgin. According to the prescribed medical and scientific trends, the fact of the hymen was not the definitive proof of virginity, because in some cases the hymen is so flexible that it is not torn. And sometimes delivery events for the first time explode. Records on the evidence indicate that the husband and wife had tried to prepare their medical certificate after consulting the doctors themselves, but the court did not cite the same for examination, which led to better personal intervention by the court. Was showing. The petition filed by the husband under the proviso (c) of section 2 (v) of the dissolution M was to be done by the court for medical examination of the parties. The Family Marriage Act, 1939 was not even considered by the Family Court before the Family Court granted the dissolution of the marriage due to instability of the husband, the Family Court acted without jurisdiction. And it did not hold that the Family Court could not pass an order for dissolution. She married because of her husband's disapproval, unless, at the request of the husband, she had to satisfy the court in the same court from the date of the order that if she had satisfied the husband's court within that period. He stops being impotent. The same woman involved, passed an order dissolving the marriage because of impotence best law firms from Kharian lawyer