Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MODERN TEXTILES FINISHING MILLS versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX


The Reference Penalty Income Tax of Income Tax CIT (Appeal) Tribunal, rejecting the CIT (appeal) order, would not respond to a reference to consider a new court-related case on the merit because the CIT case. (Appeals) is in the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, section 256 of the merit (1) and 271 (1) (c) of the reference to concealment of the penalty income, which was canceled by the CIT (Appeal) Tribunal. Referring to the CIT (Appeal) order for fresh reconsideration will not answer the reference because the matter is before the CIT (Appeal) Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 256 (1) and 271 (1) (C)

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Chak 4 b c lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.