Find a Lawyer

KHAWAJA AHMAD KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 302/148/149 Definition of evidence was supported by this incident despite the ocular testimony of the deceased's two real sons, although the testimony of a witness will not be undermined, but as has been proved by the evidence. That the two alleged witnesses were at odds with the accused party, their testimony needed to be substantiated with other circumstances, especially when the alleged presence of eyewitnesses at the scene was strongly suspected that the two alleged eyewitnesses. The witness, who was the victim's son and had direct enmity with the deceased, opened fire on only one father, while his two sons / eyes were shot. Han, who was allegedly involved with his deceased father, was rescued for some reason when all the suspects were armed with shotguns and did not appeal because At a short distance of 7/8 speed, the five accused will lose their targets, the absolute escape of witnesses was unnatural, and the most important alleged eyewitnesses, as well as the investigating officer, confessed. Many other people who were present on the spot and came close to the body immediately after the incident, the fact that such witnesses They reported the incident to the investigating officer. But his statements were never recorded, the ocular testimony of the eyewitnesses allegedly failing at all to obtain any support from the circumstances, or preliminary investigation by any independent and unidentified source and After the arrest of the accused, an FIR was lodged, which revealed it. Immediately after the incident, this chase also seemed unnatural law websites from Kallur Kot lawyer