STATE versus SHAWAL KHAN
Pakistan Penal Code Arts 3 and 4 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324 and 353/149 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Constitution of Section 13 of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (2B) of Proof Appeals against the appellant were traveling in a pickup where large quantities of drugs, firearms and ammunition were recovered, in which case the accused would be considered to have kept his articles until he could prove it by evidence. Did not prove that the vehicle was not present. His knowledge was not in accordance with the principles set by the Supreme Court to examine the evidence in such cases, referring to the Federal Shariah Court for seeking strong evidence for the recovery of the articles mentioned in the case, the evidence of the prosecution was natural and It was affecting confidence. It was alleged that the trial court had sentenced him to drugs, punishment and punishment under Article 3 of the Prohibition. The Head (Order), 1979 was restored in the same way that the trial and punishment of the accused under section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, were retained in such circumstances that the appeal against the accused's conduct. Was accepted to that extent.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Gujrat lawyer