MARIAM versus ZUBAIDA BAI
Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Section 2 (T) (J) and 15 Landlord and Tenant Maintenance Request for Eviction The appellant / alleged tenant denied the existence of a landlord and tenant relationship between the parties. Before the leaseholder was required to establish jurisdiction and tenant relationship between the parties, to exercise jurisdiction under the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979, nonetheless against the respondents / alleged landlord. The appellate court found in the lawsuit filed by the appellant (the alleged tenant) that the court Claiming that the underwriter was illegal against the landlord and had no authority or right to file an eviction petition against the alleged tenant, after the leaseholder (defendant) had left the property The jurisdiction was accepted and it was also learned that the landlord and the tenant were present between the parties in view of their relationship to the partner. The alleged landlord's claim was false and unreasonable, requiring the appellant as their tenant. The charges filed by the landlord was responsible for the sharpest decline that was worth hearing. Dismissed by the rental controller
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Khair Pur Mir lawyer