MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus S. SAYEED HASAN
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (h) and 15 (2) Withdrawal Requirements The competence of the landlord application filed by the landlord against the tenants in connection with the shops was challenged on the grounds that the shops. May not be used for commercial purposes. Vacated for residential purposes The property was originally a residential quarters, and some of the shops that were carved were rented by the original owner, which the landlord later purchased and the original owner lived with his family until then. Until it was purchased. Through the existing landlord's property, it was not particularly commercial, especially when the tenant failed to present a document to the court which could indicate that the entire belt where the property in question was In fact, the eviction request filed by the landlord was made
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Kalar Syedian lawyer