NAHEED PERVEEN versus MAHFOOZ
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) The Landlord's Personal Needs The tenant alleged that the landlord needed to run a business and that the landlord resided in the residential area and That can't happen. Evidence that the landlord can be used to run a business is available on the record, that many people in the aforementioned area built shops in their quarters that were given to them for residential purposes only, and the fact that the tenant had their own The written statement acknowledged that the tenant had been rejected. The applicant's houses located in the residential area and the landlord did not seek permission from the concerned authority to run the business as many people were running their shops in the area around them, so the concerned authorities had to inform them. To take action against. At this point the alleged breach of the terms of the rent controller's lease search was, thus, not the case for the landlord's demand for a residential property for use for business purposes: otherwise the landlord may It was presented in support of his claim that, once fully established, the tenant was instructed to occupy the vacant lot with respect to the landlord. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Khewra lawyer