Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HAIDER versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT (CIVIL JUDGE 1ST CLASS), RAHIMYAR KHAN

West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5 and Schedule Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 151 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the restoration of marital rights filed by the husband and legal for the marital relationship filed by the wife. The choice was made. Consolidated and evidence was filed in the collective rights restoration case. Earlier, the husband withdrew his case for the restoration of marital rights and filed a suit to marry in favor of the marriage on the basis of his wife's claim. Be decided The evidence in the collective suit (of which the husband's case was withdrawn for restitution of marital rights) was accepted by the Family Court. The field court claims there are two cases in favor of marriage that decide on the evidence based on the case. There was no logic in what was previously the husband's case, but the wife could rely on the husband's evidence in the previous case for Darius. In the same vein, she can take advantage of the fact that she can adopt the proper procedure for the wife to appear before the recorded evidence in the previous case. The court may not consider any of its unjust right to include evidence in support of her claim. Can't snatch a party. On the basis of the evidence already recorded on various grounds, the order of the trial court was withdrawn, under which it ordered the judgment of the wife on the testimony of the husband's previous case and the trial. The court was instructed to take appropriate opportunity. To give evidence to the parties in support of their own position in accordance with the law famous high court advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer