WALI MUHAMMAD versus DUR MUHAMMAD
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 O XIV, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The right of irrigation of land was not constituted by the court for proper matters. Such an objection was raised before the High Court, Was properly dealt with and repulsed for good. Because of this, however, if any of the issues arising out of the trial were not compiled by the trial court, the plaintiff should have asserted that claim at the appropriate stage. No action was taken in that direction, and they did not deserve relief in any way. Such a confusing case was not settled by the trial court regarding the width of the plaintiff's private canal, they could not make any legitimate claim with him on the basis of admission to the fieldbook, However, before that, it was not emphasized by the plaintiffs. The High Court High Court properly maintained the conclusions regarding the harmony of the courts below.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Daska lawyer