Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE


Section 497 Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 6 (1) Sanctions (XLV of 1860), Section 242424 / ail 34 Bail, proof of the use of weapons of prosecution is not proof. Appearing or examining by a special court, the special judge's general observation that a 30-bore pistol was a light semi-automatic weapon, was being prosecuted by a special court, had no significance and was subject to question of jurisdiction at the appropriate stage. Without determining, there was a special court. Not to interfere with the bail granted to the accused by the special court through magistrate exercise was not appropriate in one case, because the order of canceling the bail of the accused by the special court was not proper. The Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975 was read with section 497 (5), consequently the CCP was withdrawn and the accused was admitted on bail accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Kallur Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.