Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE

Section 497 Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 6 (1) Sanctions (XLV of 1860), Section 242424 / ail 34 Bail, proof of the use of weapons of prosecution is not proof. Appearing or examining by a special court, the special judge's general observation that a 30-bore pistol was a light semi-automatic weapon, was being prosecuted by a special court, had no significance and was subject to question of jurisdiction at the appropriate stage. Without determining, there was a special court. Not to interfere with the bail granted to the accused by the special court through magistrate exercise was not appropriate in one case, because the order of canceling the bail of the accused by the special court was not proper. The Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975 was read with section 497 (5), consequently the CCP was withdrawn and the accused was admitted on bail accordingly. property advocates from Ghazi lawyer