IRSHAD AHMED versus ALLAH DITTA
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 and 199 In question, the land below the factory was on an annual lease with the vacant owner of the government factory, which was moved by appellant's predecessor to machinery and debris only. ? Nor did the State High Court properly interfere in its constitutional jurisdiction by the Board of Revenue to ascertain such facts. The High Court in its order had said that the appellants had agreed to buy the land in question from the State Board of Revenue. Applicants were advised to sell the landed land if it was still available and if it was in their possession. If so, the Board of Revenue's order benefited from it: the constitutional petition was just and fair and the same was properly maintained by the High Court, the appellants expressed dissatisfaction with the High Court decision and their appeal. Was dismissed by the Supreme Court on the basis of his statement
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Dadakhel lawyer
