Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD MASOOD RAZA KHAN versus CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB, LAHORE


Punjab Land Reform Rules 1972 R12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicants to review the order of the Land Commissioners' jurisdiction to declare reclamation indicators units advance on land. On October 25, his order entitled the Land Commissioner. 1977 allowed a 10% reduction in production index units. Such an order was not challenged by the applicant and has been finalized, therefore, waiver / loss of product index units due to Sam and Thar. The issue of deficiency did not deserve to be resurrected. The Deputy Land Commissioner had no jurisdiction to file an appeal against the Land Commissioner's order, stating that his date 30th would revise the order of his predecessor after 1975, except that the Deputy Land Commissioner's Order 4 10 1984 Was approved to enforce the order only. Chief Land Commissioner's Date was not open for any appeal or revision on 2 1984, especially when the Chiefland Commissioner applied the Index Index units for production of 81 acres in the municipal limits to his Canal Land Production Index units. The plea for calculation was accepted, however, on the issue of waiver on the basis of Sam and Thar, however, could not be appealed against the deputy land order. The Commissioner, which deals with the re-enumeration of production index units in relation to ground conditions in the municipal boundaries, was also not open to interfering with the Land Commission officials' orders on the direction of the Chief Land Commissioner and the High Court did not properly apply to the applicants. Rejected a case for constitutional petition leave

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Faisalabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.