Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAJJAD versus CHAIRMAN, P.N.C.B., ISLAMABAD

Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 (1), Proviso (b) promotes service tribunal publicity, although it was not the right of a public servant, but public servants had the right to consider their own name when the cases. I listed cases in development issues. His cadre was raised and he may challenge his super session before the tribunal in any kind of suspicion under section 4 (1) of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, which prohibits him from determining fitness. In that case no appeal will lie to the tribunal or otherwise. An individual may be appointed to or hold a particular position, but the service tribunal may question eligibility and examine whether public servants, despite being senior in opposing government employees, are the employees of a depressed public servant. Whether or not there has been any injustice. , Was ignored and government employees were given a selection grade despite opposition from the government employees, there was no evil against the government employees, in the case of injustice and patriotism, the service tribunal could go on. ? famous supreme court advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer