PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O XVII, R3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 After the termination of the evidence of the applicants for exclusion of the tenant, Failure to do so before the repeated adjournment was allowed The title of litigation in the premises of the dispute had already been proved in the Supreme Court by the parties, under which the landlord was considered to be the landlord in the tenant, Even then, the landlord was denied the title and the legal tenant. The rent was not paid by the lender, which gave the tenant eleven opportunities to include oral or documentary evidence but to no effect. Eliminating unnecessary legal technical abilities should be dealt with not only immediately but also abstractly, the only requirement being rent control is that the tenant had to take appropriate opportunity against the eviction request that the landlord already had The court was certified by the Supreme Court, and after the tenant became a legal tenant, non-payment of rent by such tenant was not valid and when offered to pay the rent when already committed to the post. Had been done Thus, it was appropriate not only to give the rent controller evidence of the tenant but also to justify the eviction of such tenant; the rent controller and the appellate court in order to dismiss the tenant. There is no error in any decision / order by, as such, was present in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Machi Goth lawyer