Find a Lawyer

FAZAL BIBI versus MUNIR AHMAD

West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Sections 13 and 15 disclosure of personal need for tenant dwellers, essential evidence produced by landlords, suspected of their personal need, who wanted to start their own business in the rental premises. Because they had nowhere else to go. On the same evidence the record clearly indicates that the landlord had no other business home to evict the tenant due to personal necessity, only in accordance with his requests, to make a statement on oath Needed, so they can describe what they need. Revealing the need for landowners, which is not included in cross-examination, was considered important evidence that could not be neglected or destroyed for any external reasons, especially when the contents of the record, and the evidence. Progress tended in favor of landlords based on factors that were neither relevant nor material .This was material to think about .They were the owners of the residential land and the disclosure of financial resources through the wrongdoing houses. Had nothing to do with personal need where the oath statement was permanent and his credibility was not shaken, while Rick There was a tilt in favor of content in terms of order and circumstance. Maintaining the landlord's request, then, in terms of section 13 of the ordinance, the matter should be investigated on the basis of protection in which auxiliary check is provided to protect the tenant against any provocation eviction. ? The two courts faced misrepresentation, not reading the evidence and not considering the material facts, and for that reason, best law firm from Mian Chunnu lawyer