Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL


Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Rules of premature increment were allowed for a public servant of approximately 7 years when he was withdrawn from employment. So the service tribunal found the civil servant entitled to benefits. Prior to the premature increase, it was placed in BPS 16, similar cases of premature increment IDs to BPS 11 were granted to other officials of the department, therefore, the service tribunal The controversial decision was in accordance with the principle of consistency. Not to mention that there was no misunderstanding or substance to be considered before the decision of the service tribunal, otherwise it was a reasonable order that a permanent injunction not to guarantee interference by the Supreme Court under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution. The appeal was denied.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.