Find a Lawyer

SHAH ZAREEN KHAN versus SADA GUL

Sindh Rented Prices Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (ii) The rent controller defaulting on the payment of rent had accepted the landlord's removal request as default in payment of rent. On the basis that no evidence was available on record. Establish a practice or contract / acceptance by the landlord to receive the rent normally for several months instead of paying the rent regularly each month, the tenant has been affiliated, from time to time. It is through payment. On which the tenant paid more than one rent in salary and after adjusting / allocating the rent, the landlord had enough credit to pay the dispute rent which was high enough for the tenant to do so. Such a fact should have been accepted was irrelevant and irrational. As a matter of principle it is true and credible that if there was no specific claim made by the content of the witness on the contention of the matter, contrary to the proposals which were to be cross-examined, then it had to be given full credibility and It was generally acknowledged to be true unless displaced by reliable, strong, and clear evidence that the landlord had a lot of credit in advance. The tenant, in these circumstances, did not set a default in seeking rent controller in the payment of the rent, in this case, thus, could not be retained. when you need a advocate from Mingora lawyer