Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus MUHAMMAD ZIKRIA

The manner of proof of the execution of documents presented in the Convention E-Evidence Order 1984 Article 78 wherein any person accused of having the document presented in writing, in writing or in writing, in such signature or in writing This person's signature must be proven / handwritten. Call the person who signed the document or wrote it down. Calling someone in whose presence it was written. Calling a handwriting expert; calling the person who was familiar with the manuscript by which such document was to be signed or written. Comparing controversial signatures in court or writing with some recognizable signature or writing. And by the evidence of admission by the person who alleged that he had provided the signature or written document in which he had to sign or prove his signature where the question was to prove his signature or signature. The document in question had minor witnesses. It was stated that he did not see the prosecution and kept his signature on the bid of the star witness (who was related to the plaintiff) (his evidence was the appellant's valuable star witness who did not affix his signature to the document. Had played a real role since the beginning) In the question, such events spoke out loud about his credibility, therefore, the courts below were clearly correct and only acknowledged that The evidence of the plaintiff's witnesses did not affect the credibility documents, thus, the executor's signature / handwriting was not tolerated and the forgery It was. And hypothetical in situations property advocate from Amangarh lawyer