Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

STATE versus GULZAR MUHAMMAD


Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Articles 249 A, 265 K & 561 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The case against the accused was registered in 1973 and despite the directive the High Court The trial court was issued within a month to complete the trial, only five witnesses were examined in this case, despite the passage of almost a quarter of the case still delayed by 15/16 years. Was not encountered. After submitting an invoice to the trial court at the end of the trial, no assumptions could be specified, as such delays are a good way to prevent a court action from being abused. The place was and the High Court was. Section 616161A is absolutely justified in discharging its exercise of powers under the CRPC, even though sections 249A and 265, the trial under the CRPC, despite the availability of alternative remedies * The appeal for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court accordingly

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Bannu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.