BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MULTAN versus MUHAMMAD BAQIR ALI TATARI
The Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974 Section 4 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-Court Appeal to the Civil Service-specific positions indicated that the recruitment committee would test and interview the candidates and the candidates were interviewed. And after its formalization, the final merit list was to be submitted to the notice board on 16 2 1997 while appointment papers were to be issued on 23 2 1997, completed by such formal government. After that, the appointment letters were to be handed over to the selectmen on 23 2 1997. The government directed the ban on 22 2 1997 and directed that no appointment letter should be issued to the selected respondents according to the merit list which had been accepted and the appointment letter was issued to the appellants. Was instructed to do. The ban on recruits did not apply to the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (Appellants), largely because the board was a lawful and independent body, while the letter from the Department of Education banning respondents was to provide care. The tests and interviews conducted during the valet government were purely on merit, which entailed assigning letters of appointment. Respondents were issued with the intention of depriving the candidates of the positions selected on the merit that the respondents were selected on the merit after being advertised in the newspapers. He was entitled to the appointment for which he was neither elected nor the government appellant could deny the defendant's favor by closing the door on his employment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
